<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ShoeMoney, John Chow, Etc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/</link>
	<description>We are here to increase your profit. Period.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Affiliate Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shoemoney SERPS Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>The Affiliate Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shoemoney SERPS Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] ShoeMoney, John Chow, Etc.AdCenter: Sucking Harder Than A DysonTop 5 Tips to Succeed in Affiliate MarketingHow To Choose A Winning OfferAffiliate Marketing: What NOT To DoAffiliatizing YouTube [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ShoeMoney, John Chow, Etc.AdCenter: Sucking Harder Than A DysonTop 5 Tips to Succeed in Affiliate MarketingHow To Choose A Winning OfferAffiliate Marketing: What NOT To DoAffiliatizing YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Okay, how's this for ironic.  I ended up here indirectly via Shoemoney's site after reading his latest article which I found very useful regarding manipulating search strings.

But in all honestly, only a day or two ago I thought to myself that Shoe and John's blogs are on the decline quality wise.  I continue to read daily though on the chance that today is a day they drop a golden nugget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, how&#8217;s this for ironic.  I ended up here indirectly via Shoemoney&#8217;s site after reading his latest article which I found very useful regarding manipulating search strings.</p>
<p>But in all honestly, only a day or two ago I thought to myself that Shoe and John&#8217;s blogs are on the decline quality wise.  I continue to read daily though on the chance that today is a day they drop a golden nugget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>They are running out of idea and contents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are running out of idea and contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whydowork</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>whydowork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Lots of bloggers struggle with the chasm of going from a personal blog to a business.

When your blog reaches a critical mass of subscribers, it is no longer acceptable to the hordes of readers to talk about the same topics, or pump out lower quality posts, so i'd disagree with Steven in #23.

Rants about the quality of a particular bloggers work just signal to me that they are no longer serving their customers as greatly as they did at the beginning. 

The great thing about the Internet is that the culture and business models are always evoloving, so it's unlikely that bloggers will EVER run out of "trade secrets" as many of the markets haven't even been created yet! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of bloggers struggle with the chasm of going from a personal blog to a business.</p>
<p>When your blog reaches a critical mass of subscribers, it is no longer acceptable to the hordes of readers to talk about the same topics, or pump out lower quality posts, so i&#8217;d disagree with Steven in #23.</p>
<p>Rants about the quality of a particular bloggers work just signal to me that they are no longer serving their customers as greatly as they did at the beginning. </p>
<p>The great thing about the Internet is that the culture and business models are always evoloving, so it&#8217;s unlikely that bloggers will EVER run out of &#8220;trade secrets&#8221; as many of the markets haven&#8217;t even been created yet! <img src='http://www.afftoolbox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What attracts you: the Blog or the Blogger? &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>What attracts you: the Blog or the Blogger? &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] of AfftoolBox thinks John Chow and Shoemoney belongs to that exclusive list. I must first admit that I read these two blogs mentioned and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AfftoolBox thinks John Chow and Shoemoney belongs to that exclusive list. I must first admit that I read these two blogs mentioned and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I can't believe something this pointless got dugg. Whether it's true or not, especially in the case of shoemoney who's blog isn't even primarily about teach others money making secrets, it's their blog and they can write whatever they want. Just like any store have the right to sell whatever goods they want. As a reader or consumer or customer, you have the right to choose whether or not you want to visit their site. Don't like how the quality has dropped, don't bother with it.

This has got to be the billionth rant on the same redundant topic circulating around the blogosphere, and to think that readers still expect the "elite" bloggers to pump out a certain topic consistently is an unreal expectation. A book can only be so big before it runs out of information to feed. Books of the same topic can only reword things so many time. A blog is no more than a metaphoric online book with each post adding new pages towards the final ending. Eventually, these guru will run out of "trade secrets" you're looking for and you'll have to dig up new secrets elsewhere. 

That aside, you should read their blog because you like the overall blog, not just because you want to learn the secrets to making it big. Unfortunately if that's all you're there for, I am sure you'll continue to be disappointed in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe something this pointless got dugg. Whether it&#8217;s true or not, especially in the case of shoemoney who&#8217;s blog isn&#8217;t even primarily about teach others money making secrets, it&#8217;s their blog and they can write whatever they want. Just like any store have the right to sell whatever goods they want. As a reader or consumer or customer, you have the right to choose whether or not you want to visit their site. Don&#8217;t like how the quality has dropped, don&#8217;t bother with it.</p>
<p>This has got to be the billionth rant on the same redundant topic circulating around the blogosphere, and to think that readers still expect the &#8220;elite&#8221; bloggers to pump out a certain topic consistently is an unreal expectation. A book can only be so big before it runs out of information to feed. Books of the same topic can only reword things so many time. A blog is no more than a metaphoric online book with each post adding new pages towards the final ending. Eventually, these guru will run out of &#8220;trade secrets&#8221; you&#8217;re looking for and you&#8217;ll have to dig up new secrets elsewhere. </p>
<p>That aside, you should read their blog because you like the overall blog, not just because you want to learn the secrets to making it big. Unfortunately if that&#8217;s all you&#8217;re there for, I am sure you&#8217;ll continue to be disappointed in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxBro</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxBro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>You're overlooking one important thing: Many of those A-list bloggers you refer to have a grand plan of which their personal blogging constitutes one integral role among others. Aside from blogging about how to make money online, John Chow has his own ad referral network he runs, not mention probably other projects on the side. You see this strategy by big bloggers all over the web. Darrel Rowse runs b5media, Tucker Max runs Rudius Media, etc.  

Once you achieve a certain status in a profession, you're given the ability to move on into other avenues beyond the job that originally got you to the top. This happens in almost every profession, so it is not blog-specific. Look at Michael Jordan. Even though he retired three times and kept coming back to the NBA, he still oversaw his Jordan brand clothing, and formerly managed the Washington Wizards. He branched out into over avenues aside from basketball because he knew his status as the world's best current basketball WOULD NOT LAST FOREVER.

There is also this. At some point there is only so much one can write about any one subject by any one blogger before it starts to get a little stale. In book publishing Stephen King can write a bestseller every year and that's fine, but for blogging it's infinitely harder to maintain high traffic levels if you're pumping out the same type of stuff year after year.            

There's plenty of great stuff out there. If the A-listers aren't saying it, someone else as yet unknown probably is, and perhaps saying it better. Simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re overlooking one important thing: Many of those A-list bloggers you refer to have a grand plan of which their personal blogging constitutes one integral role among others. Aside from blogging about how to make money online, John Chow has his own ad referral network he runs, not mention probably other projects on the side. You see this strategy by big bloggers all over the web. Darrel Rowse runs b5media, Tucker Max runs Rudius Media, etc.  </p>
<p>Once you achieve a certain status in a profession, you&#8217;re given the ability to move on into other avenues beyond the job that originally got you to the top. This happens in almost every profession, so it is not blog-specific. Look at Michael Jordan. Even though he retired three times and kept coming back to the NBA, he still oversaw his Jordan brand clothing, and formerly managed the Washington Wizards. He branched out into over avenues aside from basketball because he knew his status as the world&#8217;s best current basketball WOULD NOT LAST FOREVER.</p>
<p>There is also this. At some point there is only so much one can write about any one subject by any one blogger before it starts to get a little stale. In book publishing Stephen King can write a bestseller every year and that&#8217;s fine, but for blogging it&#8217;s infinitely harder to maintain high traffic levels if you&#8217;re pumping out the same type of stuff year after year.            </p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty of great stuff out there. If the A-listers aren&#8217;t saying it, someone else as yet unknown probably is, and perhaps saying it better. Simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProFlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>ProFlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Yes, I totally agree. While not all do this, some of the A-list bloggers use a standard pattern to their blogging, that begins with their posts; they write about some new service they have discovered that can make you money, such as the latest advertising widget. The article is normally quite long and well written, espousing the virtues of the service and how effective it will be as a source of revenue for your blog.

You will even find convenient links to the widget throughout the article, that make it so much easier for you to go to the site and find out more information, or better still sign up for yourself. What you will not see, or read however, is the fact that the blogger bringing you this latest information on the service has previously been contacted and already signed up for affiliate marketing or some other revenue sharing model.

Now most of people will know this for what it is, but many new to blogging will not. I think they are being fed recycled rubbish with no other intent then to boost the A-list bloggers revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I totally agree. While not all do this, some of the A-list bloggers use a standard pattern to their blogging, that begins with their posts; they write about some new service they have discovered that can make you money, such as the latest advertising widget. The article is normally quite long and well written, espousing the virtues of the service and how effective it will be as a source of revenue for your blog.</p>
<p>You will even find convenient links to the widget throughout the article, that make it so much easier for you to go to the site and find out more information, or better still sign up for yourself. What you will not see, or read however, is the fact that the blogger bringing you this latest information on the service has previously been contacted and already signed up for affiliate marketing or some other revenue sharing model.</p>
<p>Now most of people will know this for what it is, but many new to blogging will not. I think they are being fed recycled rubbish with no other intent then to boost the A-list bloggers revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I think this is true with a lot of sites. I used to read TechCrunch religiously , but now can't stand it, as it has become pretty obvious that the only companies covered have some sort of relationship with the writers. Not so much with Arington, but some of the new writers it is pretty obvious they are either getting paid to write about companies, or it is some sort of favor. Just my opinion. I think Arington's posts are still great, but have been watered down with bad writing from some of the new guys and it just kills the site.

A lot of this has to do with the power these sites yield and in many cases I think they abuse it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is true with a lot of sites. I used to read TechCrunch religiously , but now can&#8217;t stand it, as it has become pretty obvious that the only companies covered have some sort of relationship with the writers. Not so much with Arington, but some of the new writers it is pretty obvious they are either getting paid to write about companies, or it is some sort of favor. Just my opinion. I think Arington&#8217;s posts are still great, but have been watered down with bad writing from some of the new guys and it just kills the site.</p>
<p>A lot of this has to do with the power these sites yield and in many cases I think they abuse it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mubin</title>
		<link>http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Mubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afftoolbox.com/2007/12/08/shoemoney-john-chow-etc/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>said the cow...

Everyone likes to post about things they dont like and vent..  lets not forget your recent anger at:

1) Daring for not shipping your PS3
2) Fatman unleased
3) The new owners of cashquests</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>said the cow&#8230;</p>
<p>Everyone likes to post about things they dont like and vent..  lets not forget your recent anger at:</p>
<p>1) Daring for not shipping your PS3<br />
2) Fatman unleased<br />
3) The new owners of cashquests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
